Federal Civil Litigation Attorney

Practicing federal civil litigators review, rank and edit AI-drafted court motions, judging persuasiveness, structure, clarity and tone against real litigation standards. They also write realistic motion assignments and build criteria for grading AI legal arguments. The listing looks for a JD, active US bar membership and filings from at least three motions the attorney won. Remote contract; no pay, hours or location limit stated.

What you would do

• Compare AI-generated motions and rank versions, explaining your preference and reasoning
• Assess whether each motion meets professional standards and note what needs fixing
• Edit motions until they are ready to file and describe the changes made
• Write realistic motion assignments based on federal civil litigation scenarios
• Build criteria for judging the quality and effectiveness of AI legal arguments

What the listing asks for

• Preferred: JD and active US bar membership in good standing
• Preferred: substantial hands-on federal civil litigation and motion drafting experience
• Preferred: at least three winning court motions, with filings to show during screening
• Preferred: drafting motions to dismiss, summary judgment motions or similar federal filings
• Preferred: appellate work or a judicial clerkship alongside litigation practice

Suits practicing federal litigators with a strong motion practice who can explain clearly why one brief persuades and another falls flat.

The listing does not state a rate. Where: Remote, no country limit stated. Contract work for micro1, a company that hires experts for AI training projects.

Applications go through micro1's own site. AI Trainer Guide is an independent guide to AI training work, not micro1 or its recruiter. The apply link on our page is a referral link: micro1 may pay us if it hires you, at no cost to you.